littleboxes music
More Kids. More Evidence?
So, it turns out that the PANDA, that's me, knows quite a lot about Michael Jackson and the Michael Jackson trial. So, in a constant search for something to write about I have decided that it might help to write about something that I actually know something about. I'm not sure how the first entry of my little mini-blog of Michael Jackson case should start. I'm sure others have these MJ-case related blogs already fired up and in prime running mode.
The folks over at the parent company (littleboxes) were a bit worried about more of a focus on Jackson scaring readers away. However, after I assured them that I have absolutey no readers, they agreed that this could do no harm.
------------------------------
The big news today is that Judge Melville has decided to allow some (but apparently not all) past molestation allegations concerning Mr. Jackson into the trial. Why some and not all? I am totally not sure as it has yet to be explained.
Why and what does this mean?
Prosecutors want to show that Mike is a bad man who has done this before. They want to show that past allegations are similar to the current allegation. They want to do this because their current accuser is just horrible (in a witness sense, not necessarily as a person). This helps their case.
Of course, they aren't actually going to have alleged victims coming in and testifying. That would just be too damn simple for this case. They are going to have third parties come in and testify as to what they have seen. One third party alleges to have seen MJ molest McCauley Culkin. Of course, Culkin denies that anything inappropriate every happened. Most of the "third party" is a group of former employees that sued Jackson for firing them because they knew about him being a pedophile. Get this, after they sued him, they lost the case and had to pay Mr. Jackson's legal fees. Ouch! So here they are again. You think they have any motivation to get Mr. Jackson again? If he is found guilty they could end up with some money. Of course, they could just be benevolent souls who stood idly by while children were being molested and then only reported something after they lost their jobs.
This was a horrible first post. I apologize. But, whatever. No one is reading anyway. It will get better. When I get more time we'll lay out the current case and talk about what's so damn weird about it.
Conclusion: This past evidence stuff really sucks for Michael Jackson. No he has to defend himself from several allegations at the same time. And not even allegations from actual alleged victims but allegations from people who claim to have seen something. Crazy. well, I guess they are called witnesses. But it sure would be nice to have an actual alleged victim testify. Supposedly we'll only get one alleged victim to testify for 5 total alleged molestations. And no, Jordan Chandler, of the 1993 most famous case, will not testify.
The folks over at the parent company (littleboxes) were a bit worried about more of a focus on Jackson scaring readers away. However, after I assured them that I have absolutey no readers, they agreed that this could do no harm.
------------------------------
The big news today is that Judge Melville has decided to allow some (but apparently not all) past molestation allegations concerning Mr. Jackson into the trial. Why some and not all? I am totally not sure as it has yet to be explained.
Why and what does this mean?
Prosecutors want to show that Mike is a bad man who has done this before. They want to show that past allegations are similar to the current allegation. They want to do this because their current accuser is just horrible (in a witness sense, not necessarily as a person). This helps their case.
Of course, they aren't actually going to have alleged victims coming in and testifying. That would just be too damn simple for this case. They are going to have third parties come in and testify as to what they have seen. One third party alleges to have seen MJ molest McCauley Culkin. Of course, Culkin denies that anything inappropriate every happened. Most of the "third party" is a group of former employees that sued Jackson for firing them because they knew about him being a pedophile. Get this, after they sued him, they lost the case and had to pay Mr. Jackson's legal fees. Ouch! So here they are again. You think they have any motivation to get Mr. Jackson again? If he is found guilty they could end up with some money. Of course, they could just be benevolent souls who stood idly by while children were being molested and then only reported something after they lost their jobs.
This was a horrible first post. I apologize. But, whatever. No one is reading anyway. It will get better. When I get more time we'll lay out the current case and talk about what's so damn weird about it.
Conclusion: This past evidence stuff really sucks for Michael Jackson. No he has to defend himself from several allegations at the same time. And not even allegations from actual alleged victims but allegations from people who claim to have seen something. Crazy. well, I guess they are called witnesses. But it sure would be nice to have an actual alleged victim testify. Supposedly we'll only get one alleged victim to testify for 5 total alleged molestations. And no, Jordan Chandler, of the 1993 most famous case, will not testify.
posted by littleboxes at 4:13 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home